October 2017 in Spamtraps: ESPs

ESP spam seen in spamtraps, October 2017

ESP spam seen in spamtraps, October 2017

Read more…

The Four Horsemen of Finnish Spam

If you sent Finnish B2B spam recently…

  • Your spam is illegal if it does not identify the sender (Section 15 of the Business Information Act, 244/2001).
  • Your spam is illegal if it does not identify the spam list (Section 25 of the Personal Data Act, 523/1999).
  • Your spam list is illegal because it contains outdated and erroneous personal information (Section 9 of the Personal Data Act). If you bought a list, you can’t avoid this.
  • Your spamming is illegal because you hit natural persons with no business context (Section 200 of the Information Society Code, 917/2014). If you bought a list, it contains outdated and erroneous personal information and you can’t avoid this.

Bonus item:

  • If you own a product or a service and bought a spam campaign from somebody else, you are responsible for failures regarding the above even if you’ve never seen the materials.

September 2017 in Spamtraps: ESPs

ESP spam seen in spamtraps, September 2017

ESP spam seen in spamtraps, September 2017

Read more…

August 2017 in Spamtraps: ESPs

ESP spam seen in spamtraps, August 2017

ESP spam seen in spamtraps, August 2017

Read more…

July 2017 in Spamtraps: ESPs

ESP mail seen in spamtraps, July 2017

ESP mail seen in spamtraps, July 2017

Read more…

June 2017 in Spamtraps: ESPs

ESP mail seen in spamtraps, June 2017

ESP mail seen in spamtraps, June 2017

Read more…

May 2017 in Spamtraps: ESPs

ESP mail seen in spamtraps, May 2017

ESP mail seen in spamtraps, May 2017

Read more…

April 2017 in Spamtraps: ESPs

ESP mail seen in spamtraps, April 2017

ESP mail seen in spamtraps, April 2017

Read more…

March 2017 in Spamtraps: ESPs

ESP mail seen in spamtraps, March 2017

ESP mail seen in spamtraps, March 2017

Read more…

Long-term ESP performance in spamtraps

A collaborator inspired me to draw a few more graphs (you know who you are, and thank you very much for the idea).

I had retained the numbers for the ESP blogs ever since May, so it occurred to me that it might be pertinent to do a time series. The graphs are expressed in percentages against the total amount of ESP spam received, so the growth of total volume (for example, as a result of adding more spamtraps) is already accounted for. Since the data points are naturally mostly at the low end of the scale, a logarithmic scale seemed appropriate.

So, please find enclosed three graphs of ESPs appearing in spamtraps, divided into Transactional, SMB Marketing and Enterprise Marketing. The selection of ESPs and their division to these three categories is according to the ideas of the collaborator. NB. We only started tracing Zeta Interactive in August.
Read more…

Go back to top